McCollum Crowley — Defend Differently
ArizonaJul 29, 202639 min opinionConstruction

Gallery v. K Hovnanian

Supreme Court of Arizona decided this construction matter on July 29, 2026. The case reached the court on appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County (No. CV2020-008714). The dispute has been in litigation for roughly 6 years. Montgomery wrote.

Construction claims
Arizona high court building or courtroom
Image: davidpinter, CC BY 3.0

What the court held

We hold that, because § 33-2002 and related statutes encompass a cause of action for construction defects arising out of a failure to adhere to community workmanship standards, the Legislature has modified the common law to authorize homeowners’ associations to bring what constitutes an implied warranty suit.

Quoted from the court's own holding or syllabus. Confirm against the linked opinion before relying on it.

How the case got here

  1. Trial court

    Filed in 2020

    Superior Court in Maricopa County · No. CV2020-008714 · Judge Katherine Cooper

  2. Court of appeals

    Intermediate appellate review

    Court of Appeals, Division One

  3. High court review

    Docketed at the high court, 2024

    Supreme Court of Arizona · No. CV-24-0252-PR

  4. Jul 29, 2026

    Decided

    Opinion by Montgomery · Reversed and remanded

Key passage

In this case, we must determine whether, by enacting A.R.S. § 33-2002, the Legislature has authorized a homeowners’ association to bring such a suit regarding both common areas it owns and properties owned by individual homeowners.

Why this matters

Supreme Court of Arizona reversed and remanded. The opinion is published, so it binds Arizona trial courts until the court revisits it. This decision may shape the allocation, timing, or defense of construction and property-loss claims.

Review focus

The contract, defect, or property issue presented

How the court allocates duties among project participants

Any effect on timing, damages, or available defenses