J.B. v. MKBS, LLC
Supreme Court of Colorado, reported at 2026 CO 50M, decided this liability matter on August 3, 2026. The case reached the court on certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals. Hood wrote, sitting en banc.

What the court held
We conclude that the district court didn't abuse its discretion by concluding that, under these circumstances, a reasonably careful person might have similarly neglected the duty to respond to the complaint.
Quoted from the court's own holding or syllabus. Confirm against the linked opinion before relying on it.
How the case got here
- Court of appeals
Intermediate appellate review
Colorado Court of Appeals
- Aug 3, 2026
Decided
Opinion by Hood · En banc
- Post-decision
Opinion modified
The court modified this opinion after its original release.
Key passage
“Then, we review the factors a court must balance before setting aside a default judgment and apply them to the facts of this case.”
Why this matters
The opinion is published, so it binds Colorado trial courts until the court revisits it. Márquez dissented, so the reasoning drew a split on the court. This decision may influence fault analysis, damages, procedure, or the defense of civil liability claims.
Review focus
The duty, fault, causation, or damages issue on review
The procedural posture and standard applied by the court
The decision's effect on litigation and settlement posture
